![]() |
|||||||
|
Exchanges with Nicaraguan maquila unions in 2000 Exchanges with Honduran maquila unions in 2000 The first exchange in May focused on union leadership structures. Jennifer Hill and Paula Bentley, both from SEIU traveled to Honduras for the workshop, and developed an agenda in collaboration with Honduran organizers. A second exchange was held in October, where US and Honduran participants shared strategies for solving workplace health and safety problems. We realized that in both countries, unions often depend on strong shop floor organizing instead of long and costly legal battles to win gains for their members. For this training, Jennifer Hill returned and was joined by UNITE's Laurie Kellogg. With these links in mind, the US-based organization STITCH coordinated an exchange between the Washington State UFW and the Coordinadora de Sindicatos Bananeros de Honduras (COSIBAH, the Coordination of Banana Unions of Honduras) and the Sindicato de Trabajadores Bananeros de Izabal (SITRABI, the Union of Banana Workers of Izabal) in Guatemala. We planned the December exchange to provide opportunities for activists from the three groups to share strategies, build connections, and consider future joint activities. In Honduras, a leader from the UFW met with leaders from the eight COSIBAH member unions to discuss the groups’ respective label projects. The UFW emphasized the need to carry out consumer research, while COSIBAH leaders talked about the challenges of selling the idea to their members. In Guatemala, the UFW activist led a workshop with 18 SITRABI stewards. The workshop focused on mobilizing the rank-and-file for contract negotiations, which SITRABI expected to begin shortly after the training. Activists from COSIBAH and SITRABI, in Honduras and Guatemala, commented that is was extremely helpful to learn about concrete techniques, like mapping the workplace, which had brought good results in the United States for immigrant workers there. The UFW activists who participated felt it was particularly interesting to hear about the Central America’s work on pesticide issues and both left feeling that the exchange had left them with new ideas for organizing and representing agricultural workers. |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||