![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Women
Workers in the Banana Industry
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Country | Union* | Non-Union |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | no unions | $2-$5 |
| Nicaragua | $3-4 | $2 |
| Guatemala | $7 | $4 |
| Honduras | $7 | $4 |
| Panama | $8 | $6-7 |
| Columbia | $8 | $6-7 |
| Costa Rica | $9 | $6 |
*While women's daily wage is generally the same as men's on union plantations, women's actual earnings tend to be from 40-70% less since they can only work when there is fruit ready to be packed.
Since the late 1950s, banana workers in Central America have generally worked on plantations owned by Dole, Chiquita and Del Monte. Many, though not all, of these plantations were unionized. Through years of organizing and hard-fought labor struggles, by the 1990s banana workers enjoyed some of the highest wages and best job security among agricultural workers in the region. Then the “Race to the Bottom” began, as producers searched for cheaper sources of labor to save on costs and avoid responsibility for working conditions. The “Race to the Bottom” in the banana sector is fueled by multinational corporations' use of independent, anti-union, and non-union producers, where workers are paid substantially less as noted in the above graph. Of the three primary producers, more and more Del Monte banana production is being shifted away from plantations that are direct subsidiaries. Dole is using a combination of joint ventures and independent producers, and only Chiquita retains a large percentage of its own production. In making these changes, banana companies are responding to those further up on the globalization food chain: stockholders and supermarket chains. Both want to see production costs cut in order to boost their own profits .
The supermarket chain-fueled Race to the Bottom intersects with other factors to further challenge union stability. After Hurricane Mitch, many Central American banana plantations chose to replant with African palm instead of banana plants. African palm (used to make palm oil) requires significantly fewer workers than bananas, so when a plantation turns over to African palm, many workers—unionists—lose their jobs. Also, in Ecuador , banana unions were virtually destroyed in the 1970s, and repression of union efforts there continues. Moreover, exporters like Noboa are often able to avoid paying even official minimum prices due to lax or corrupt enforcement. Ecuadorian bananas are cheaper and more profitable for multinationals and supermaket chains in comparison to bananas from other Latin American countries.
Banana unions throughout Latin America have not taken these challenges lying down. They have joined together to confront these issues by creating COLSIBA, or the Coordinadora Latinoamericana de Sindicatos Bananeros (Latin American Coordination of Banana Unions) in 1993 to strengthen solidarity among banana unions and enable them to negotiate jointly with multinationals. Many of the Central and Latin American unions are also affiliated to the IUF – the International Union of Food Workers. Due to a very effective international campaign run by COLSIBA, the IUF, and US/LEAP (U.S. Labor Education in the Americas Project), Chiquita recognized its responsibility for working conditions on its suppliers' plantations in a Regional Worker Rights Agreement signed in 2001.
Banana
Trade Wars: New Challenges for Banana Workers
After a challenge in the World
Trade Organization brought by the United
States , the European Union is poised
to change their rules on banana purchasing by 2006. Currently, the trade
laws of the European Union favor banana producing countries that were
former European colonies, as well as subsidizing EU producers because
of their higher costs of production. In contrast, bananas produced in
Latin American include tariffs (taxes) and are subject to quotas or export
ceilings. Even with these added costs, bananas are purchased for a higher
price in the European Union compared to the United
States . With the change in the market,
many banana companies are concerned that their already low profits (in
the face of the pressure of Supermarkets) will drop even lower. There
are a number of different proposals on how the EU will meet this challenge
from the WTO to change their system. EUROBAN, an nonprofit organization
in Europe
organizing for the rights of workers and small farmers supports moving
to a tariff-only system and giving aid to any workers or small farmers
who are harmed by the transition. But, ultimately, the shift in the market
will again lead to workers being hard hit, no matter which plan is chosen.
As more and more companies look only at the bottom line, it is vital that
consumers begin to push back. [10]
TAKE
ACTION IN SOLIDARITY
Banana workers in Central
America are doing their part by organizing
and supporting Unions throughout the region. However, they can not win
these important victories without support from consumers. Below are a
few action steps you can take and encourage others in your community,
union, or women's group to take with you.
Supermarkets
in the United
States are having a bigger role in
setting the price, and therefore the salaries of workers in Central
America . Next time you are shopping
ask to speak to the produce manager. Ask him or her where they purchase
their bananas from. In the next year, fairly traded union produced bananas
may become available in the U.S. market. Ask your supermarket to buy them.
Big
Box Stores , such as Wal-Mart,
are the leading economic force behind the race to the bottom. Their desire
for lower prices comes at a huge cost to thousands of workers around the
world, even in the United States .
Educate your friends and family and help them find better places to shop.
Better Trade Policies are vital to protecting workers around the world. Contact your elected officials and encourage them to include rights and protections for workers in trade agreements. You can find their contact information at http://www.house.gov or http://www.senate.gov.
Join STITCH's Action Email Alert! Send your name and email address to STITCH at stitch@stitchonline.org . We will let you know when you can take action to target specific laws and corporations.
3 Interview with Bob Perillo, US/LEAP, September 2002
[1] History of the Banana Industry, Speech prepared by Bob Perillo, US/LEAP, February, 2005.
[2] History of the Banana Industry, Speech prepared by Bob Perillo, US/LEAP, February, 2005.
[3] Mujeres Trabajadoras Bananeras: Desafios y Esperanzas,” COLSIBA, April 2002.
[4] “Projections for Supply and Demand of Bananas to 2005,” Committee on Commodity Problems, Intergovermental Group on Bananas and Tropical Fruits, May 1999.
[5] Perillo, Bob. Interview.
[6] “Health Risks for Women Banana Workers.” Ana Victoria Naranjo, ASEPROLA, 1999.
[7] IBID
[8] IBID
[9] Supplied by German Zepeda, COLSIBAH General Secretary, 2002.
[10] EUROBAN and Banana Link, http://www.bananalink.org.uk/